Find the barriers that block your users
An accessibility review identifies the accessibility barriers on your site that have the biggest impact on real people. Our IAAP‑certified experts test manually with assistive technology and evaluate your site against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2, so you see the issues that matter without the noise.
You get findings your team can act on. Each issue explains what’s wrong, who it affects, and what a good fix looks like. Instead of a defect list, your developers, designers, and content authors get guidance they can use right away. You choose how much hands‑on support you want as you make the changes.
If your organization is new to accessibility, this is the right first step. A review shows where you actually stand and builds your team’s skills at the same time. You'll finish with a clear picture of your barriers and people who know how to fix them.
What an accessibility review includes:
-
Targeted accessibility recommendations
We don't just dump a list of defects. We conduct manual accessibility testing against WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 standards, focusing on the high‑traffic paths that matter most to your users. You receive findings with clear, actionable context so your team knows exactly what to fix and why. These include screenshots and the steps to reproduce them.
-
Training your team as we go
For the length of the review, your team members can learn directly from our experts. Rather than handing over a document and leaving, we walk through what we found and show your developers, designers, and content authors how to make the fixes themselves. The skills stay with your team after the review ends.
-
Development assistance
If your team would rather have hands-on help, we can work alongside your developers on the changes, or make them ourselves. This is useful when the barriers sit in shared components, where one careful fix resolves the same problem in many places.
-
Verification testing
Once changes are in, we retest them and confirm they work for the people they were meant to help. A fix that looks right in the code can still fail with a screen reader, so you find out from us rather than from your users.
When a review fits
- You are getting started with accessibility. If your company has not done any meaningful accessibility work yet, a review is the most useful place to begin. It tells you where you stand in plain terms, and the training that runs alongside it leaves your team with a foundation to build on rather than a backlog to stare at. Dedicated training is available separately as well.
- You are exploring a new feature or functionality. A review can be scoped to a single new flow, whether it is something you are still designing or something you have just built. Accessibility questions get answered while the work is still easy to change, rather than after it reaches everyone.
- You received a demand letter. You need to know what is actually wrong, and you need to know quickly. A review of the flows named in the complaint gives you and your counsel something concrete to work from. Our team also offers accessibility legal expertise if the matter progresses.
- You are scoping remediation budget. It is difficult to ask for funding without evidence. A review of representative journeys shows the shape and severity of the problem, which is usually enough to size the work and make the case internally.
Need a formal conformance evaluation?
Some customers and government clients require a documented conformance claim, with a VPAT or Accessibility Conformance Report. That is a different engagement: see our comprehensive accessibility audit for details.
Start with a conversation
Tell us what you are working with and what is driving the timeline. We will scope a review around the parts of your site that matter most, and around how much hands-on help your team wants.